The ENTCHEV GIS Blog

“We make GIS maps” in the Department of Redundancy Department

One of the axioms of GISdom is that it is not easy to explain in simple terms what we do. The quest for clear, informative, succinct and catchy phrase continues, as evidenced by the efforts of Terry Stigers (@tpstigers) et al. Terry’s most recent effort is driven by his unacceptance of the term “GIS maps”. Others on Twitter agreed with Terry, likening the term “GIS maps” to ATM machine and NIC card.

This is where I disagree with Terry and the rest. I agree that “GIS maps” does not accurately describe what we GIS geeks do, and that the term is redundant. So are ATM machine and NIC card (also PIN number). But the above three are accidentally redundant – i.e., the user does not realize there is a redundancy. On the other hand, GIS maps is redundant the way “Mercedes car” is redundant – the user recognizes and intends the redundancy. The user believes that adding GIS/Mercedes to the description of their item adds a degree of sophistication to their item that ordinary maps/cars do not possess.

I base this statement on numerous observations over many years – both of consultants trying to sell their wares, and of GIS system (another redundancy!) users trying to impress their bosses.

Comments are open, so let me know whether you agree with me.

The New Jersey municipal boundaries GIS dataset sells for $5,800. What is your GIS dataset worth?

If you are not yet familiar with WeoGeo, it’s time to look into what this innovative bunch is doing. In short, they are establishing themselves as the iTunes of geospatial data.

WeoGeo is a place where you go to find, buy and sell GIS datasets. Kind of like the New Jersey Geographic Information Network (NJGIN) for the world. I have been keeping tabs on WeoGeo for a while, so when they launched their most recent feature – an embeddable widget allowing a look into the WeoGeo marketplace from any website – I decided to give it a whirl.

The widget works great, as you can see below. You can browse the WeoGeo marketplace right from my blog’s page, and you can find and purchase geospatial data. I don’t make anything on the sale – no Amazon-style referral program yet. But it must be coming, I’m sure.

An interesting thing caught my eye as I was browsing the WeoGeo catalog. A New Jersey municipal boundaries dataset from Pitney Bowes Business Insight (PBBI (formerly MapInfo)) sells for a whopping $5,800. This is in stark contrast to the freely downloadable NJ municipal boundaries dataset available from NJGIN. For the record, I have not compared the two products – I am only familiar with the free NJGIN dataset – so I don’t know how the PBBI product differs from the free one. But there is a business lesson to be learned there, probably more than one.

The prices on the WeoGeo marketplace are not controlled by WeoGeo – they are set by the sellers. There is clearly money to be made from adding value to products in the public domain and selling the value-added product. There is value in having your dataset listed on a marketplace where a Fortune 100 company might see and buy it. And there might be a buyer out there for that GIS dataset that you just developed. So throw it up on WeoGeo and see what happens.

I don’t take a commission. For now.

Can you procure beauty? An interview with David Imus

The geo press has written before about David Imus and his map-making shop. But earlier this week it was a muggle publication that noted the award bestowed upon Imus and his map “The Essential Geography of the United States of America” – called by consensus “the best US map”. Which it clearly is, hands down. The map is a meticulously crafted product, and a pleasure to look at. It is a piece of art. It is superb.

As I was marveling at the map, I thought about how much it would cost to make a map like this, and whether it would be feasible – or even possible – to contract for and order such a map under current procurement practices.

The Imus map took 6,000 hours to make, by Imus’s own estimates. I do not doubt or challenge his estimate. But can you imagine the reaction of today’s typical purchasing agent reading the hypothetical Imus map-making proposal? “$327,000 for a map? You cannot be serious. Everyone knows that these days you just push a button and a map comes out of the computer. Take $1,200 to cover your printing costs, or get out of my office.”

I hypothesized that the only way the Imus map could be made would be as a labor of love. Like movie or rock stars’ fan webpages, which are often much better than the “official” website, the Imus map could only be made if the maker was not concerned with billing his time. The Imus map could never be spec’d, ordered or procured as a product or professional service. It would be deemed unreasonably expensive.

I decided to test my hypothesis by reaching out to the man himself. To my delight, David Imus turned out to be very approachable, and promptly responded to my questions. Here is our exchange:

Q: “I see your map as a product of love rather than a business product. Am I correct, or did you set out to make a best-selling product from day one?”

A: “It was both. Making the Essential Geography was a labor of love. But I knew that if I made the most expressive map ever made of the USA and people were to find out about it, there would be a chance that map would be well-received. It's gratifying to see that it is.

My goal was to make the kind of map of the United States that I would want to have, a map that would reveal the essential character of our country. As I worked on the map I wasn't thinking "Oh, this is going to pay off," I was following my bliss doing something that I truly loved to do.”

Q: “I calculate the cost of designing your map around $327,000, based on NJ state contract pricing from 2007. What do you think about this number, and do you think you will recover the cost by selling maps?”

A: “I went way out on a limb to make this map. I'm pleased to know that because of the success I'm seeing, I'll be able to pay back the loans to the people who went out on that limb with me.”

Q: “Is there anything else that you would like to say to the ENTCHEV GIS blog readers?”

A: “It seems people think geography is merely a dull subject taught in schools; and honestly the way geography is taught in schools below the college level doesn't interest even me, and I live and breathe geography. But geography is our way to notice the world; to take note of the rich tapestry of landscapes that cover the planet we live on, which is, as far as we know, the most exotic and fascinating planet in the entire universe.”

I am back

Many readers of this blog have noticed that I disappeared from the online scene on October 5, 2011. I am back.

My disappearance and the surrounding ordeal have been and continue to be documented on my personal blog Tenth Cave, so I will not rehash them here. But I must say a few things:

I was amazed and overwhelmed by the outpouring of support for my cause from the online GIS community. Totally floored. Not that I didn’t expect support, but the sheer volume and the intensity of the compassion went above and beyond my wildest expectations. Thank you, thank you, thank you all!

While I cannot mention everyone who gave of their time and more (it would be a very long list), I would be remiss if I did not specifically thank the following GIS folks for helping spread the word and otherwise supporting me and my family during this difficult two-month period: John Reiser, Dawn McCall, Randal Hale, James Fee, Brian Timoney, Adena Schutzberg, Jane Elliott, Caitlin Dempsey, Bill Dollins, Glenn Letham, Chris McClain, Dave SmithTerry Stigers, Skip Cody, Mano Marks, Josh Livni, Andres F. Thank you all for your kindness and selflessness.

The show must go on, and it will. This blog will refocus back on GIS as soon as the dust settles and things get back to normal. See you soon!

Thanksgiving Note from Atanas

Never before in my life have I had the occasion to thank so many people.

First off, I give thanks to the thousands of folks who have supported me in myriads of ways-by signing the online petition, by writing letters of support, by voicing support in social media, by sending money.  I thank you all very, very much!

Secondly, I thank the team of close friends and family headed by my attorney Eric Mark for their ongoing tireless work towards our release.  Your efforts are priceless, and I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Finally, I thank my family for their unwavering resilience in the face of adversity.  I know you are going through a much more stressful time than Eni and I are, and my heart goes out to you.  I love you all very much.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Atanas Entchev
November, 24, 2011
Delaney Hall Detention Center
Newark, NJ

Please sign this Petition for Atanas

From Atana's wife Mayia:

Dear Friend,

I just created a petition entitled Tell ICE: Stop the deportation of Atanas Entchev and family , because I deeply believe we should be allowed to stay in U.S. which is our home.

I'm trying to collect 1000 signatures, and I could really use your help.

To read more about what I'm trying to do and to sign my petition, click here:
http://www.change.org/petitions/tell-ice-stop-the-deportation-of-atanas-entchev-and-family

It'll just take a minute!

Please ask your friends to sign the petition as well. Grassroots movements succeed because people like you are willing to spread the word!
Thank you very much in advance, you help is greatly appreciated by our family.

Mayia Entcheva

WHY THE ENTCHEVS SHOULD RECEIVE PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION

This is taken from http://www.freeatanas.com/public-appeal/ and was written by Eric M. Mark, Esq.

Eric M. Mark, Esq. Phone: 201‐394‐4676
P.O. Box 9151 Fax: 201‐262‐7640
Paramus, NJ 07653‐9151 EricMarkEsq@gmail.com

Atanas Entchev A# 073 178 406
Mayia Entcheva A# 073 178 405
Enislav Entchev A# 073 185 055

 

WHY THE ENTCHEVS SHOULD RECEIVE PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION

 

Both Atanas and Enislav are currently detained at the Delaney Hall facility pursuant to an Order of Deportation issued on September 24, 2009, for which all subsequent appeals were denied. Mayia is not currently detained. The fourth member of the family, Christina Entcheva is married to a U.S. Citizen and is a Lawful Permanent Resident. The family is the epitome of the type of people who have made this country what it is and who the U.S. should want to live within its borders. Atanas and Mayia are nationally and internationally recognized experts in their fields who have contributed brilliantly and energetically to American institutions, and Enislav has been living in the U.S. since he was two years old and is a graduate of New Jersey public schools.

The immigration history of the family is long and complex. Atanas initially arrived in the U.S. on August 18, 1991 as a nonimmigrant exchange visitor and the recipient of the Humphrey Fellowship for Urban Planning at Rutgers University. The rest of the family arrived in 1992 and 1993 as family members. In 1993 they applied for Political Asylum, which was denied in 1996 based on changed country conditions in Bulgaria. The decision was timely appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. In the interim, Atanas became the beneficiary of a visa as an Outstanding Researcher or Professor. Their lawyer at the time failed to properly file a Motion to Reopen and Request for Remand and the BIA refused to remand the case to the Immigration Judge for reconsideration. The BIA denied the appeal in 2002. A subsequent appeal to the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals resulted in a remand to the Immigration Judge. The matter then made its way through the BIA and the Third Circuit, again. During the summer of 2011 the Third Circuit denied the last appeal and request for a stay.

As you are well aware, on June 17, 2011 ICE Director John Morton issued a memo to ICE Field Office Directors to provide guidance on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. As has always been true pursuant to prior policy, prosecutorial discretion can be exercised at any point in the removal process, including after entry of an Order of Deportation. The memo lists the factors, both positive and negative, that should be considered when evaluating requests for prosecutorial discretion. An analysis of these factors shows that many positive factors and no negative factors apply to Atanas, Mayia and Enislav.

1. The agency’s civil immigration enforcement priorities According to Director Morton, ICE must prioritize its enforcement to ensure the aliens it removes represent threats to national security, border security, public safety and the integrity of the immigration system.

None of these descriptions apply to the Entchevs. On the contrary, in their time in the U.S., Atanas and Mayia have contributed to the well-being of numerous municipal, state and federal government agencies. Along the way they have made every effort to, and in fact did, comply with all immigration, federal, state and local laws.

2. The person’s length of presence in the U.S.,

with particular consideration given to presence while in lawful statustanas has been in the U.S. since 1991. Mayia and Enislav since 1992 and 1993. All three came to the U.S. on valid visas and remained in lawful nonimmigrant status throughout the duration of their stay. Only recently, in the summer of 2011, when the long complicated immigration process concluded did the family enter non-lawful status. Despite this, the family did not purposefully violate the deportation order. Rather, they were waiting for notification by mail that they had to leave the U.S. They did not realize that no such notification would arrive. For Enislav, the U.S. is the only home he has ever known. He has no memories of Bulgaria. He does not speak Bulgarian. He went to elementary, middle and high school in New Jersey, and attended Middlesex County College for two semesters before the requirement to pay out of state tuition became overly burdensome. The family has grown up together as Americans, in America for 20 years.

3. The circumstances of the person’s arrival in the U.S. and the manner of his or her entry, particularly if the alien came to the U.S. as a young child

Atanas entered the U.S. with the blessing of the U.S. government and a grant to study at Rutgers University. He excelled in his studies and began a successful and acclaimed career in Geographic Information Systems and shortly thereafter his family lawfully joined him in New Jersey. Enislav arrived when he was two years old.

4. The person’s pursuit of education in the U.S., with particular consideration given to those who have graduated from a U.S. high school or are pursuing a college degree

All three members of the Entchev family benefited from the U.S. education system. Mostnotably, Enislav completed all of his schooling at New Jersey public schools and obtained a GEDfrom New Brunswick Adult Learning Center. He is fondly remembered by teachers and administrators from his elementary school, high school and Middlesex County College. Enislav pursued a college education at Middlesex County College, and finished two semesters of study. However, because of his status he had to pay out of state tuition and could no longer afford to continue his studies. Atanas completed his post-graduate degree at Rutgers University. Both Atanas and Mayia have contributed tremendously to educational institutions throughout the Northeast. Atanas was an adjunct professor at Monmouth University. Mayia designed the Microsoft School of the Future, which is part of the Philadelphia Public School District and has won international awards. She is currently working on a $20,000,000 Charter School in Brooklyn, NY. She has received high praise for her work on an Elementary School in Monroe, NJ, as well as many other places.

5. Whether the person’s immediate relative has served in the U.S. military

None of the Entchevs have served in the U.S. military. However, while such service would be a positive factor, the absence of such service, particularly where it was not a viable option as a nonimmigrant, is not a negative factor, either.

6. The person’s criminal history, including arrests, prior convictions, or outstanding arrest warrants

None of the Entchevs have any criminal convictions or other negative reflections of character. Enislav was arrested for possession of marijuana, but the charges were dismissed when the person he was with admitted that the marijuana belonged to him and not Enislav. The person’s immigration history, including any prior removal, outstanding order of removal, prior denial of status or evidence of fraud

7. The person’s immigration history, including any prior removal, outstanding order of removal, prior denial of status or evidence of fraud

None of the Entchev’s have committed any immigration violations, been previously deported or removed, been accused of fraud or been denied status. Throughout their 20-year stay in the U.S. they have taken every effort and spent thousands of dollars to comply with immigration regulations. The only blemish in the otherwise spectacular history is the denial of the waiver of the two-year home residency requirement, for which USIA did not provide a reason. In 1997 Atanas was approved by the Immigration and Naturalization Services for a visa as an Outstanding Professor or Researcher. His native country, Bulgaria, waived the two-year home residency requirement, but the United States Information Agency denied the waiver, without providing a reason.

8. Whether the person poses a national security or public safety concern

Of course not. In 20 years no one has violated the law, been accused of any security related concern or public safety issue. On the contrary, Atanas and Mayia have contributed to the public safety of the residents of the Northeast U.S. and continue to contribute to local, state and federal governments. Atanas is currently involved in a project with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as well as Brick Township, Woodbridge Township, North Brunswick Township, Mount Laurel Township, Voorhees Township, Rutgers University, Monmouth University, City of Orange, Rowan University, Camden County, and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

9. The person’s ties and contributions to the community, including family relationships

The fourth member of the Entchev family, Christina, also arrived in the early 1990s. Three years ago she married a U.S. Citizen. In 2010 she received Lawful Permanent Resident status. She currently lives with her husband in Jersey City, NJ. The family is very close knit. They see each other at least once a week and speak more often than that. Christina and her husband work closely with Atanas. Atanas and Mayia are activiely involved in several community groups, including the Raritan Yacht Club, where Atanas volunteers his time to manage the website for the Hospice Regatta,which has raised over $60,000. Both Atanas and Mayia volunteer their time to conduct seminars, as well. Mayia is also an active member who contributes extensive time, energy and resources at a local tennis club.

10. The person’s ties to the home country and conditions in the country

The family has not been to Bulgaria in 20 years. Enislav has no memories of Bulgaria and does not speak Bulgarian. He does not know a single person in Bulgaria. For the last 14 years the family has unsuccessfully pursued political asylum from Bulgaria. While the courts were never satisfied that Atanas could meet the burden of proof for past persecution, there was never an inference from any judge or reviewer that the claims were frivolous or unfounded. Rather, the courts relied on the changed country conditions to deny the asylum claim. However, this does not mean Bulgaria would be a friendly place to the Entchevs. It has not been home to the Entchevs in 20 years; their home is in New Jersey.

11. The person’s age, with particular consideration given to minors and the elderly

Enislav is 21 years old. He has been in the U.S. since he was two years old. He is not a minor in calendar years, but he is a DREAM Act eligible individual who wishes to pursue a college education.

12. Whether the person has a U.S. Citizen or permanent resident spouse, child or parent

Atanas’s and Mayia’s daughter, and Enislav’s sister, is a permanent resident.

13. Whether the person is the primary caretaker of a person with a mental or physical disability, minor or seriously ill relative

This does not apply. But it is also not a negative factor.

14. Whether the person or the person’s spouse is pregnant or nursing

This does not apply. But it is also not a negative factor.

15. Whether the person or the person’s spouse suffers from severe mental or physical illness

This does not apply. But it is also not a negative factor.

16. Whether the person’s nationality renders removal unlikely

This does not apply. But it is also not a negative factor.

17. Whether the person is likely to be granted temporary or permanent status or other relief

from removal The only thing preventing Atanas and his family from obtaining permanent residence is a stubborn refusal to grant a waiver of the two-year home residency requirement where the home country has submitted its waiver. Since beginning acknowledged as an Outstanding Professor or Researcher and receiving a visa, Atanas has contributed to the welfare and success of so many American organizations, governments and businesses that he has returned America’s investment in him exponentially. Rather than requiring him to stay overseas for two years, we should be asking him to stay and never leave. Also, Atanas daughter has now gained permanent residence. This fact could lead to a reconsideration of the waiver. Christina gained her residence through marriage to a U.S. citizen, and will be eligible for citizenship herself in less than three years. At that time, she would undoubtedly petition for permanent residence for her parents and brother.

18. Whether the person is currently cooperating or has cooperated with federal, state or local law enforcement authorities

This does not apply. But it is also not a negative factor. The factors in the Morton Memo are not exhaustive, and no one factor is determinative. Decisions should be based on the totality of the circumstances with the goal of conforming to ICE’s enforcement priorities. One factor absent from the Memo is the good moral character of the person and the desirability of having that person remain in the U.S. Kind, charitable, well-liked, hard-working people are a commodity. As evidenced by the volume of character and professional references supplied on behalf of the Entchevs as a family and as individuals, this is an entire family of ideal Americans. These letters were collected in only a matter of days, without the help of Atanas and Enislav who are detained. Given some extended time, the letters from colleagues, friends, clients, neighbors and others will multiply. Another factor that must be considered is the potential passage of the DREAM Act. Although the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act failed to advance as an amendment to the defense bill in September 2010, it was re-introduced as a standalone bill days after. In April 2011, at least 25 Senators, including Dick Durbin, Richard Lugar, Charles Schumer, Harry Reid and Frank Lautenberg asked DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano to end the deportation of DREAM Act-eligible students, and specifically requested that deferred action be granted to those individuals. It is impossible to assert that deporting law-abiding, academically gifted, professionally accomplished, internationally recognized, communally accepted, DREAM Act eligible people who have called the U.S. home for twenty years is within the priorities of ICE.



Free Atanas!

Entchevs 20 year legal battle to stay here.

Please read. While you are reading please remember that Atanas and his son are being held in a "Community Education Center". I called it Jail. That's pretty much everyone else calls it except the people running it.

But it looks so nice:


http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/104369np.pdf

Donate. Help.

Free Atanas.

Brian Timoney and James Fee ask you to help!

Good People...A call to help.

Brian Timoney from MapBrief sums it all up - Please visit his blog
.

A native of Bulgaria, Atanas came to the US in 1991 in the wake of the turmoil in Eastern Europe following the disintegration of the Iron Curtain, etc.  The winding road of the 20-year legal saga can be found here. To a layman, it reads as a story of differing interpretations of perceived threat in a chaotic political climate and a litany of motions, counter-motions, and paperwork deadlines.  Amid these gray areas of interpretation, there is no accusation of any type of criminal behavior on the part of Atanas or his family members during their 20-year stay here. Given that Atanas became firmly established professionally and his family lived the life of the educated middle-class, the question of “why deportation now?” lingers.

Having little faith in the efficacy of appealing to the better nature of politicians, I would nonetheless urge you to, in addition to the methods of support listed above, drop a line to Atanas’ Senate and Congressional representatives asking why taxpayer money is being wasted on imprisoning a non-criminal immigrant entrepreneur and his family members–

                     Congressman Frank Pallone (Atanas’ office is in his district)
                     Senator Frank Lautenberg
                     Senator Robert Menendez


James Fee from Spatially Adjusted has put out a call for donations: 

If everyone who will read this post in the next 24 hours gives $3 to the Atanas Entchev support fund, we’ll have over $5,000 raised for Atanas’ defense.  It doesn’t take much.


Donate. Help.

Free Atanas.



Plea for Help

More news from the Entchevs. I was contacted by Mayia and Christina. This was taken from his blog www.tenthcave.com/ . There is a paypal link on that site to help with donations. I will be donating shortly.

After living legally in the United States for over 20 years, I was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on an immigration charge, and am currently facing deportation. My son Eni, 21, who came to the United States at the age of two, is also detained and wears an orange jumpsuit through no fault of his own. We continue to pursue all possible legal avenues to remain in the US – our home.

However, our 18-year immigration ordeal has depleted our resources. My detention is about to cripple my small IT consulting business. We cannot keep up with our growing expenses, and I have no other choice but to turn to the community for help.

I ask friends and sympathizers of our cause to donate to our legal fund. No donation is too small. Please spread the word.

Thank you for your kindness, and God bless you.

Posted for Atanas Entchev, by his daughter, Christina

As the owner of a small business, North River geographic Systems, Inc, I know how things can spin out of control quickly on a good day. I can't imagine being uprooted from your life and sent to a place you left 20 years ago.

More updates as they become available.

Free Atanas.