My view on GIS in the Cloud
A GIS colleague recently told me that, to him, I seem completely un-excited about GIS in the cloud. I find this amusing. I guess it's true. I'm not really excited about GIS in the cloud, at least not in my professional life, as a very busy municipal planner and GIS user. One reason cloud GIS may not excite me is that I don't know exactly what it means!
Personally, I love Google Maps, Bing 3D, Streetview, MapMyRide, and similar services. My husband thinks I'm nuts when I talk about these things. I am amazed that they exist and very curious about how they work. But are these services considered GIS in the cloud? I'm not really looking for an answer to that question. But I would like to talk a little more about why I'm not particularly excited about GIS in the cloud:
Unfortunately, I don't have the time for this new cloud GIS thing. I need something that works now. I do not have the luxury of finding time to search for some JavaScript that someone has written or to wait for someone to write an app that I have to find and figure out how to make work. Or, to test out a new technology that may change a year from now.
I have been working for city government for seven years. I have never been responsible for so many projects as in this job. And since I do not hold a GIS job title, I spend most of my time on non-GIS tasks. I do not feel like I have the luxury to play around with the cloud at work. Am I missing out? Yes. But every workday I need to make decisions about the best way to spend my time. When my director asks for a map, I can make a choice between using ArcView on my desktop, and using the cloud to respond to the map request. At this time, ArcView will win my vote hands down.
I thank all the techno geeks out there for doing all they are doing in the cloud. But I guess I feel like cloud GIS is not quite ready for prime time yet. When it is, I'm sure I will be ready to learn to use it and be fascinated by it.




When I was in State Gov, I had the same issue: limited resources and limited funding forced us to use what we had and only think about the stuff we could be doing. A cloud-based (or even a more conventional single-point web-based) city mapping application may help you in those one-off requests for maps. Newark and Jersey City have moved in that direction, but (as far as I know) either the personnel or funding was there to implement. Unless you're given the freedom to implement new tech, it's going to be seen as a buzzword-laden novelty.
Trenton has an application that, to use your terminology, is a "single-point web-based city mapping application."
A number of city staff use it regularly. I do not. It is too slow and, compared to ArcMap, it is far too limiting when it comes to map composition.
Are you saying that Jersey City and Newark have a single-point web-based GIS application as well? I'd be very curious to learn about a local government that has the freedom to implement new tech.