We raised this question back in 2008, as the economy began to founder. We were wondering how a worsening economy would affect us GIS implementers, and whether GIS was considered a necessity or a luxury by its users. Or perhaps it is both?

From what I have seen since September 2008, GIS is definitely a luxury. GIS budgets were the first to go in many New Jersey municipalities. When the town has to lay off staff and cut back essential services, GIS really does look like an overpriced accessory we can all do without.

Not that I agree (or like it), but this is the reality: In economic parlance, GIS is a luxury, up there with Rolex watches and Maseratis. And we GIS implementers are purveyors of luxury goods and services.